Hillary In FULL PANIC MODE After Breaking Evidence Is Found In Seth Rich Case

Less than an hour, after news, broke that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks, that The Washington Post published a dubious story on President Trump leaking classified information to the Russians. The convenient timing of it all has many Trump supporters claiming the news publication is using the story to distract the rest of the media from focusing on Seth Rich’s story.

Well, I am here to give you the whole scoop.

It all started last year when Seth Rich was gunned down on July 10th in D.C. just steps from his home. Since then, there have been rumors swirling about his murder and many even crying conspiracy considering there was an hour-and-a-half of unaccounted time between Rich leaving a bar and being killed. Now thanks to a Federal investigator the truth may finally be coming out.

From Fox News:

The Democratic National Committee staffer who was gunned down on July 10 on a Washington, D.C., street last July just steps from his home had leaked thousands of internal emails to WikiLeaks, law enforcement sources told Fox News.

A federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report detailing the contents of DNC staffer Seth Rich’s computer generated within 96 hours after his murder, said Rich made contact with Wikileaks through Gavin MacFadyen [pictured: bottom right], a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time.

“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

Yesterday it was confirmed by a Federal investigator that Seth Rich did indeed leak information to WikiLeaks.

The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.

On July 22, just 12 days after Rich was killed, WikiLeaks published internal DNC emails that appeared to show top party officials conspired to stop Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont from becoming the party’s presidential nominee. That controversy resulted in Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigning as DNC chairperson. A number of Sanders supporters refused to back party nominee Hillary Clinton, and some subsequently formed groups to work against Clinton and the party.

WikiLeaks leader Julian Assange has stopped short of identifying Rich as the source of the emails, but has taken a keen interest in the case, and has not denied working with Rich.

“WikiLeaks has decided to issue a US$20k reward for information leading to a conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich,” the organization announced.

Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department has no suspects and no substantial leads as to who the killer or killers may be, sources close to the investigation said. Metropolitan Police, including the police chief, have refused to discuss the case, despite requests from Fox News dating back 10 months.

The actual narrative behind Seth Rich’s murder would be devastating for Democrats because it would virtually disprove their entire narrative that Russia “hacked” the US presidential election by conspiring with Wikileaks and the Trump administration.

It would make perfect sense for the media to cover this story up. It would essentially destroy the democratic party once and for all if this story got out. The liberal media is throwing this major distraction out there to throw people off. Do not be fooled!

Share if you want to know the truth! 

H/T [Fox News, InfoWars]

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.